<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Route to Christmas: Day 15 2015</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.worldofo.com/2015/12/15/route-to-christmas-day-15-2015/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.worldofo.com/2015/12/15/route-to-christmas-day-15-2015/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 21:55:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Kocbach</title>
		<link>http://news.worldofo.com/2015/12/15/route-to-christmas-day-15-2015/#comment-123747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jan Kocbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 16:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.worldofo.com/?p=10685#comment-123747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks a lot for your comment, EH! The reason the route to the right is not included is that it was not ran by the GPS-tracked runners. I did also not really consider it, but see now that it is an alternative. I agree with you that it should be at least on par with the route around to the left (which was a lot slower than direct, but still).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for your comment, EH! The reason the route to the right is not included is that it was not ran by the GPS-tracked runners. I did also not really consider it, but see now that it is an alternative. I agree with you that it should be at least on par with the route around to the left (which was a lot slower than direct, but still).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Severiano</title>
		<link>http://news.worldofo.com/2015/12/15/route-to-christmas-day-15-2015/#comment-123746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Severiano]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 16:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.worldofo.com/?p=10685#comment-123746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agree with EH. Right route has a lot more path than left path option. maybe 75% on path versus 50% on the left option.  Maybe Timo S could comment on this choice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with EH. Right route has a lot more path than left path option. maybe 75% on path versus 50% on the left option.  Maybe Timo S could comment on this choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EH</title>
		<link>http://news.worldofo.com/2015/12/15/route-to-christmas-day-15-2015/#comment-123745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 13:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.worldofo.com/?p=10685#comment-123745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why wasn&#039;t the routechoice to the right included in the summary or analysis ?  As seen from the density map there are many (like me) who favoured a variant of this, using the paths all the way directly into the control.  It&#039;s long and around for sure, but not much more than the left choice and the entry is better end easier.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why wasn&#8217;t the routechoice to the right included in the summary or analysis ?  As seen from the density map there are many (like me) who favoured a variant of this, using the paths all the way directly into the control.  It&#8217;s long and around for sure, but not much more than the left choice and the entry is better end easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk

 Served from: news.worldofo.com @ 2026-05-01 03:07:12 by W3 Total Cache -->