<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NORT Oslo weekend: Maps, Results and Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="https://news.worldofo.com/2013/06/02/nort-oslo-weekend-maps-results-and-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://news.worldofo.com/2013/06/02/nort-oslo-weekend-maps-results-and-analysis/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 09:51:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.39</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Kocbach</title>
		<link>https://news.worldofo.com/2013/06/02/nort-oslo-weekend-maps-results-and-analysis/#comment-101065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jan Kocbach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 17:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.worldofo.com/?p=6256#comment-101065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t run this year&#039;s course, but I did run last year&#039;s. There was a lot of complaining about last year&#039;s courses, but I think the first half of last year&#039;s course was very nice. The second half was not very interesting, though, due to a lot of path/track running.

This year&#039;s courses look similar to last year&#039;s in that they are in an area quite close to the city, i.e. not wilderness. But I think the course setter has managed to set up many interesting challenges for the runners (as you can see in the GPS analysis article), especially for the men. In the women&#039;s course the percentage of &quot;transport&quot; is a bit too large. But if they are better than last year? I&#039;d say not very much of a difference, although there is less path/roads in the end of the course. 

Comparing to e.g. the PostFinance middle distance in Switzerland last year though, this course feels a lot more interesting ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t run this year&#8217;s course, but I did run last year&#8217;s. There was a lot of complaining about last year&#8217;s courses, but I think the first half of last year&#8217;s course was very nice. The second half was not very interesting, though, due to a lot of path/track running.</p>
<p>This year&#8217;s courses look similar to last year&#8217;s in that they are in an area quite close to the city, i.e. not wilderness. But I think the course setter has managed to set up many interesting challenges for the runners (as you can see in the GPS analysis article), especially for the men. In the women&#8217;s course the percentage of &#8220;transport&#8221; is a bit too large. But if they are better than last year? I&#8217;d say not very much of a difference, although there is less path/roads in the end of the course. </p>
<p>Comparing to e.g. the PostFinance middle distance in Switzerland last year though, this course feels a lot more interesting &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>https://news.worldofo.com/2013/06/02/nort-oslo-weekend-maps-results-and-analysis/#comment-101064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 17:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.worldofo.com/?p=6256#comment-101064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you think about the middle course. Was it better than last year?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think about the middle course. Was it better than last year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk

 Served from: news.worldofo.com @ 2026-04-24 20:46:59 by W3 Total Cache -->