Home / Orienteering News / WOC 2024 Sprint Relay: Maps, Results and brief Analysis

WOC 2024 Sprint Relay: Maps, Results and brief Analysis

2024-07-14 22_37_30-map_sprintrelay_men - Windows Photo Viewer

Switzerland won the World Orienteering Championships (WOC) Sprint Relay after a very strong performance by Simona Aebersold on the last leg where she outran Sweden’s Tove Alexandersson, who was later disqualified for skipping a control. Finland took the second place with Norway in third.

The two big favourites, Switzerland and Sweden, followed each other closely from start to finish – with only seconds between them throughout the course. After the second leg it looked like all the other teams where out of the gold medal battle, but a very strong leg by Finland’s Tuomas Heikkila brought Finland all the way up to Sweden and Switzerland. The 3rd leg runners of Great Britain and Norway – Ralph Street and Kasper Fosser – also ran very strong races, bringing them within 25 seconds of leading Switzerland. Finland’s anchor woman Venla Harju kept Finland in the gold battle for half of the course, but was still very happy to take Finland to a medal.

Although Switzerland has been battling for the victory in every sprint relay the last years, this is actually the first WOC gold in the sprint relay for Switzerland since 2014, and the first time since 2016 that Sweden has not won.

Maps, GPS-tracking and results are available below.

Analysis

No detailed analysis is presented of the WOC 2024 sprint relay due to the low quality of the GPS-tracking combined with split times not being offered leg-by-leg or for all common controls (only variants across legs is offered), making it challenging to do a full analysis. Split time illustrations for each forking variant across legs (the split times provided by the organizers) are plotted in the results section. Some observations based on these illustrations:

  • Switzerland’s last leg runner Simona Aebersold actually lost 20 seconds to the best split on the routechoice leg to the second control, probably due to poorer route choice. She also lost 5 seconds to the best split on the long leg to control 7. Still she had the fastest leg time, showing her excellent physical shape and high running speed.
  • Czech Republic’s last leg runner Teresa Janosikova and France’s last leg runner Cecile Calandry lost around 25 seconds to the best split on the routechoice leg to the second control – this is were they lost contact with bronze medalist Norway.
  • Finland’s 3rd leg runner Tuomas Heikkila lost nearly 20 seconds to the best split time to the second control – but ran exceptionally fast the rest of the course.

All of these had the shortest variant for the second leg (see map below). It may look like the women lost time due to taking slower variants to the right, while Heikkila took the faster route to the left, but lost time the first part of the leg.

2024-07-14 23_58_48-2DRerunViewer Alpha-version

  • Finland’s last leg runner Venla Harju lost nearly 15 seconds to the best split on the routechoice leg to control 7 – this seems to be an execution mistake rather than a routechoice mistake. Several runners lost some time (mostly less than 10 seconds) by running left on this leg, though.
  • Norway’s 2nd leg runner Eirik Langedal Breivik lost nearly 30 seconds on the routechoiceleg to control 10 – this is were Norway lost contact with the gold medal battle. This also looks like an execution error – first skipping control 10 and then having to go back and get it.
  • Great Britain’s last leg runner Megan Carter Davies lost 35 seconds to the best split on the short forking leg to control 12 (the control that Alexandersson skipped), and another  20 seconds to control 13, losing contact with the medal battle here. Both mistakes look like some strange execution mistakes.
  • France’s 2nd leg runner Adrien Delenne lost more than 20 seconds on the short leg to the 18th control, taking a strange routechoice – this looks like misreading the map.

Maps and GPS-tracking

See the maps for the men’s and the women’s legs below. GPS-tracking is available here:

map_sprintrelay_mens

map_sprintrelay_womens

Results

Plac Name Leg time Leg place Leg diff Time Tot place  Diff
1 Switzerland 1 58:43.30
1. Natalia Gemperle 14:50.59 4 14:50.59 4
2. Riccardo Rancan 14:37.09 2 29:27.80 2 -2
3. Joey Hadorn 14:37.59 6 44:05.40 1 -1
4. Simona Aebersold 14:37.80 1 58:43.30 1 0
2 Finland 1 59:22.10
1. Maija Sianoja 15:04.20 8 15:04.20 8
2. Miika Kirmula 14:43.00 4 29:47.30 4 -4
3. Tuomas Heikkila 14:21.09 2 44:08.40 3 -1
4. Venla Harju 15:13.59 3 59:22.10 2 -1
3 Norway 1 59:46.60
1. Victoria Haestad Bjornstad 14:59.40 6 14:59.40 6
2. Eirik Langedal Breivik 15:18.50 14 30:18.00 8 +2
3. Kasper Harlem Fosser 14:11.09 1 44:29.20 5 -3
4. Andrine Benjaminsen 15:17.30 4 59:46.60 3 -2
4 Czechia 1 1:00:10.50
1. Barbora Matejkova 15:30.00 12 15:30.00 12
2. Jakub Glonek 14:48.90 6 30:19.00 10 -2
3. Tomas Krivda 14:27.80 3 44:46.80 6 -4
4. Tereza Janosikova 15:23.70 6 1:00:10.50 4 -2
5 France 1 1:00:11.60
1. Isia Basset 15:34.40 16 15:34.40 16
2. Adrien Delenne 14:43.70 5 30:18.10 9 -7
3. Loic Capbern 14:31.40 4 44:49.50 7 -2
4. Cecile Calandry 15:22.00 5 1:00:11.60 5 -2
6 Hungary 1 1:00:13.60
1. Viktoria Mag 15:04.09 7 15:04.09 7
2. Zoltan Bujdoso 15:08.80 12 30:13.00 6 -1
3. Ferenc Jonas 14:57.90 11 45:11.00 8 +2
4. Rita Maramarosi 15:02.50 2 1:00:13.60 6 -2
7 Great Britain 1 1:00:16.50
1. Grace Molloy 14:48.50 2 14:48.50 2
2. Freddie Carcas 15:01.00 10 29:49.50 5 +3
3. Ralph Street 14:32.09 5 44:21.70 4 -1
4. Megan Carter Davies 15:54.80 9 1:00:16.50 7 +3
8 Austria 1 1:01:26.70
1. Anna Groell 15:30.59 13 15:30.59 13
2. Jannis Bonek 14:56.20 9 30:26.80 11 -2
3. Matthias Reiner 14:45.20 8 45:12.10 9 -2
4. Ylvi Kastner 16:14.50 12 1:01:26.70 8 -1
9 Spain 1 1:01:51.60
1. Nerea Gonzalez 15:13.70 9 15:13.70 9
2. Pablo Ferrando 15:24.09 16 30:37.80 13 +4
3. Alvaro Casado 15:24.40 14 46:02.30 11 -2
4. Ana Isabel Toledo 15:49.30 8 1:01:51.60 9 -2
10 New Zealand 1 1:02:21.00
1. Laura Robertson 16:02.70 22 16:02.70 22
2. Joseph Lynch 15:16.30 13 31:19.00 15 -7
3. Tim Robertson 14:57.30 10 46:16.40 15 0
4. Lizzie Ingham 16:04.59 10 1:02:21.00 10 -5
11 Belgium 1 1:02:48.80
1. Tille De Smul 15:47.40 18 15:47.40 18
2. Yannick Michiels 14:25.90 1 30:13.40 7 -11
3. Warre De Cuyper 15:07.50 12 45:20.90 10 +3
4. Marine Sillien 17:27.89 18 1:02:48.80 11 +1
12 Ukraine 1 1:02:52.10
1. Olena Babych 15:31.20 14 15:31.20 14
2. Illia Otreshko 15:50.50 18 31:21.69 16 +2
3. Ruslan Glibov 14:51.70 9 46:13.50 14 -2
4. Olena Pitirimova 16:38.50 14 1:02:52.10 12 -2
13 Germany 1 1:03:09.70
1. Hanna Mueller 15:34.30 15 15:34.30 15
2. Felix Spaeth 15:07.40 11 30:41.69 14 -1
3. Anselm Reichenbach 15:37.40 16 46:19.10 16 +2
4. Birte Friedrichs 16:50.50 16 1:03:09.70 13 -3
14 Italy 1 1:03:14.80
1. Caterina Dallera 15:36.40 17 15:36.40 17
2. Francesco Mariani 14:56.00 8 30:32.40 12 -5
3. Mattia Debertolis 15:36.20 15 46:08.70 12 0
4. Maddalena De Biasi 17:06.09 17 1:03:14.80 14 +2
15 Australia 1 1:03:58.80
1. Nea Shingler 16:26.40 27 16:26.40 27
2. Brodie Nankervis 15:22.80 15 31:49.30 18 -9
3. Henry McNulty 15:21.20 13 47:10.50 17 -1
4. Caitlin Young 16:48.30 15 1:03:58.80 15 -2

 

Split time illustrations

See below for split time illustrations for each of the variants for selected runners/teams. From these illustrations one can see where runners lost times.

plot

plot (1)

plot (2)

plot (3)

plot (4)

plot (5)

plot (6)

plot (7)

plot (8)

plot (9)plot (9)

plot (10)

plot (11)

 

About Jan Kocbach

Jan Kocbach is the founder of WorldofO.com - taking care of everything from site development to writing articles, photography and analysis.

Check Also

sprint_women

World Cup Italy 2024: Maps, Results & Splits analysis illustrations

From flat and relatively easy orienteering in the first World Cup round on Swiss ground, ...

One comment

  1. Carter Davies – such a shame. Those are not difficult controls. She was so good apart from those. Lost the medal here

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>