Home / Orienteering News / EOC 2024 Middle: Analysis, Maps and Results

EOC 2024 Middle: Analysis, Maps and Results

map_men_EOC_MiddleFinal_3000

Eirik Langedal Breivik (Norway) and Simona Aebersold (Switzerland) won the European Orienteering Championships (EOC) Middle on very technical, Hungarian terrain that really challenged the runners. We saw big mistakes by many athletes, with Breivik and Aebersold managing to navigate well in the steep hills while keeping high speed.

In the men’s class Kasper Fosser (Norway) and Albin Ridefelt (Sweden) took silver and bronze – after both being ahead of Langedal Breivik a few controls before the finish. In the women’s class Natalia Gemperle (Switzerland) and Andrine Benjaminsen (Norway) took the other medals, with one of the biggest favourites, Tove Alexandersson (Sweden), finishing without a medal in 4th place after a big mistake early in the course. – Today it feels like I did all the types of mistakes one can make, Alexandersson said to Swedish media after the race.

Winning times of 42 and 40 minutes means that the courses where 5-6 minutes longer than they should have been. With high temperatures, and a tough long distance less than 24 hours later, this gives a big advantage to those fewb athletes focusing only on the long distance….

See maps, GPS-tracking and results below the analysis.

Analysis Men

Below you can see a graphical representation of the race development in the men’s class for the Top 10 along with Hungarian Jonas Ferenc who started the race extremely well.

plot - 2024-08-17T222018.552

Jonas Ferenc (Hungary) started very fast, having a clear lead at the 7th control, but after losing 90 seconds to the 8th control he was out of the battle for medals. Already from halfway through the course it was clear that this was a battle between the three medalists. Below we have included a corresponding plot for the Top 3 only, where you can have a closer look at this battle.

plot - 2024-08-17T222214.535

Fosser did a 20-30 second mistake to the first control, but caught up with the other medalists after a good leg to the 4th control.

leg_01_.png (3)

Ridefelt did a 40 second mistake to the 12th control, but due to good speed and a small miss by Fosser to control 15, Fosser and Ridefelt where even when approaching the last controls.

leg_12_.png (1)

Fosser and Ridefelt seemed to have slightly higher running speed than Langedal Breivik, slowly building up a lead of around which had increased to 70 seconds at control 18 (joint lead for Fosser and Ridefelt), with Fosser losing some seconds to control 19. The 20th control proved to be the crux of this course, though, with many runners making big mistakes. Fosser lost 1:12 and Ridefelt lost 2:19 – but both had a large enough gap down to the rest of the competitors to still secure a medal.

leg_20_.png (1)

leg_20_.png (2)

Looking at where the rest of the runners with medal speed lost their medal chances,  Tomas Krivda – finishing 4th in the end just like at last year’s WOC Long distance – ran a good first half of the race and was just a few seconds behind Langedal Breivik at the 11th control, but lost a minute to control 12 and was caught by Kasper Fosser there. From there Krivda run together with Fosser until control 19, but managed to avoid Fosser’s mistake and finished 43 seconds ahead of Fosser, securing the 4th place. If Fosser would have followed Krivda to the finish, that would have been enough for the gold medal…

leg_12_.png

Loic Capbern (France) also had an excellent first half of his race, being just 26 seconds behind Langedal Breivik at control 17 – clearly in contention for a medal – but then losing first a few controls to control 18, then half a minute to control 19, another half a minute to control 20 and finally 45 seconds to control 21. With only 1:10 up to the bronze medal, this 5th place surely did not taste too good for the French runner.

The Swiss veteran Daniel Hubmann is another runner who will surely go to bed feeling he lost a medal. At control 18 he was only 42 seconds behind Langedal Breivik – and it really looked liked this could be a fantastic ending for Hubmann. Unfortunately Hubmann seemed to try to navigate another leg, and lost 2 minutes to control 19, finishing in a disappointing 9th place.

leg_19_.png (3)

Margin Regborn (Sweden) is another runner who was in clear contention for a medal – and maybe also the gold medal – until control 19, with less than 20 seconds up to Langedal Breivik. But a 6(!) minute mistake at control 20 where he checked out the edge of the map ruined all his chances…

plot - 2024-08-17T232820.682

leg_20_.png (3)

We have had some requests for “comparison against superman”-type plots in the comments from previous analyses. Below both illustrations are shown on that form as well.

plot - 2024-08-17T222222.432

plot - 2024-08-17T222247.676

Analysis Women

Below you can see a graphical representation of the race development in the women’s class for the Top 10.

plot - 2024-08-17T222401.773

From the graph it is quite clear that Simona Aebersold was in a class of her own – finishing more than 2 minutes ahead of all her competitors. The most interesting battle ahead of the race was the battle against Tove Alexandersson. The big mistake of Alexandersson to control 3 makes it difficult to see the details of her run – we therefore provide a plot of only the top 4 to be able to look more at the details in the battle for the medals.

plot - 2024-08-17T222431.701Tove Alexandersson said after the race that she had big problems keeping the direction in the flatter areas, after not preparing enough for the championships. And this was very clear when watching her GPS-track – her medal chances where nearly gone already to the third control, when she somehow managed to find the 5th control when aiming for the 3rd control. This cost Alexandersson 3:28 to Aebersold – and although she got as close as 60 seconds to the medals halfway through the course, she did too many small mistakes all the way to be able to take a medal. Her speed was fine, though – she was the only one who kept the speed of Aebersold, taking 1:20 on Aebersold from control 7 to control 12.

leg_03_.png

Gemperle also had good speed – but even without her three mistakes (control 5, 10 and 11) she would not have been close to Aebersold (who only had a small miss at control 10).

leg_05_.png (1)

leg_10_.png

leg_11_.png (1)

Benjaminsen’s speed was nearly on Gemperle’s level – with similar technical performance (small mistakes at control 4, 14 and 18 – with the largest time loss to Gemperle to control 18), in the end she was less than a minute behind Gemperle.

leg_04_.png (3)

leg_14_.pngleg_18_.png (1)

Looking at the other athletes, Paula Gross  was closest to the medals, 2 minutes behind Benjaminsen, but the Swiss runner lost more than 2 minutes on the first four controls, and did not seem to have quite the speed of the medalists.

leg_03_.png (1)

leg_04_.png (4)

Comparing the rest of the Top 10 directly with Benjaminsen, it seems clear that Marie Olaussen is the only one who really had both speed and stabile enough technical performance to beat Benjaminsen. But mistakes on control 5 and 6 – costing 3 minutes in total – ruined Olaussen’s chances.

plot - 2024-08-17T235847.256

leg_05_.png (2)

leg_06_.png

Finally, as for the men, “comparison against superman”-type plots:

plot - 2024-08-17T222421.481

plot - 2024-08-17T222411.135

Maps and GPS-tracking

See the map from the men’s course at the top of the page and the map from the women’s course below. Click the thumbnails for GPS-tracking via omaps.worldofo.com.

map_women_EOCMiddleFinal_3000

EOC 2024 | Middle Final | Men

» See map in omaps.worldofo.com
EOC 2024 | Middle Final | Women

» See map in omaps.worldofo.com

Results

Men

1 Eirik Langedal Breivik NOR 42:34 8:19
2 Kasper Harlem Fosser NOR 42:58 +0:24 8:24
3 Albin Ridefelt SWE 43:39 +1:04 8:32
4 Tomas Krivda CZE 44:15 +1:40 8:39
5 Loic Capbern FRA 44:49 +2:14 8:46
6 Emil Svensk SWE 44:52 +2:17 8:46
7 Eskil Kinneberg NOR 45:20 +2:45 8:52
8 Viktor Svensk SWE 45:50 +3:16 8:58
9 Daniel Hubmann SUI 46:02 +3:28 9:00
10 Ruslan Glibov UKR 46:37 +4:03 9:07
11 Joey Hadorn SUI 47:01 +4:27 9:12
12 Anton Johansson SWE 47:14 +4:40 9:14
13 Ferenc Jonas HUN 47:15 +4:41 9:14
14 Julien Vuitton FRA 47:28 +4:54 9:17
15 Sander Arntzen NOR 47:37 +5:03 9:19
16 Tino Polsini SUI 48:17 +5:43 9:26
17 Reto Egger SUI 48:19 +5:44 9:27
18 Loic Marty FRA 48:30 +5:56 9:29
19 Quentin Andrieux FRA 48:54 +6:20 9:34
20 Riccardo Rancan SUI 48:57 +6:22 9:34

Women

1 Simona Aebersold SUI 40:51 9:07
2 Natalia Gemperle SUI 43:10 +2:19 9:38
3 Andrine Benjaminsen NOR 44:09 +3:17 9:51
4 Tove Alexandersson SWE 45:14 +4:22 10:05
5 Paula Gross SUI 46:05 +5:13 10:17
6 Ines Berger SUI 46:41 +5:49 10:25
7 Marie Olaussen NOR 47:06 +6:14 10:30
8 Venla Harju FIN 47:12 +6:20 10:32
9 Cecile Calandry FRA 47:15 +6:23 10:32
10 Hanna Lundberg SWE 47:34 +6:42 10:37
11 Jasmina Gassner AUT 48:01 +7:09 10:43
12 Sanna Hotz SUI 48:03 +7:11 10:43
13 Tereza Smelikova SVK 48:22 +7:30 10:47
14 Miia Niittynen FIN 48:27 +7:35 10:48
15 Johanna Ridefelt SWE 48:34 +7:42 10:50
16 Maija Sianoja FIN 49:21 +8:29 11:00
17 Evely Kaasiku EST 49:24 +8:33 11:01
18 Tereza Rauturier CZE 49:45 +8:53 11:06
19 Karolin Ohlsson SWE 49:51 +8:59 11:07
20 Elza Kuze LAT 50:03 +9:12 11:10

 

About Jan Kocbach

Jan Kocbach is the founder of WorldofO.com - taking care of everything from site development to writing articles, photography and analysis.

Check Also

illustration

WOC 2024 Sprint Relay: Analysis by Course Setter Ackland

Graeme Ackland in the WOC 2024 course setting team has made a detailed analysis of ...

6 comments

  1. Szabolcs Tornai

    Hubman’s big mistake was to 19, not 9. He almost missed 19, going for 20, but realized that and turned back towards 19.

    • Thanks, Szalbolcs, this was a typo. The leg shown is the correct one, and it should also be clear from the context, but very good to get the typo fixed.

  2. One thing is clear after the individual races – the coursesetter doesn’t seem to have much of a clue about the winning times of the competitions. But really challenging and exciting courses anyway…

    • Márk Gárdonyi

      I have talked with the course setter after the competition and he told me that he actually wanted to shorten the cources, but it was not really possible, because there were too many constrains. He wanted to move the start uphill somewhat, but couldn’t get permission for that, the finish was given and even the TV controls were given. Under these circumstances it would have only been possible to shorten the courses in a manner that really decreased their quality.

    • If we consider “superman’s” time, it is quite close to the recommended winning times of the middle distance, so no too many problems observed here.

      • @Amanda: The recommended winning times are not “superman-times”, but winning times, so definitely a problem if they are too far off…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>