Home / Events / Grouping of runners: EOC Long Qual

Grouping of runners: EOC Long Qual

grouping.jpgDid the qualifiers get to the final based on their own achievements only, or did they get help from other runners through either co-working or following? Grouping of runners is always a hot topic at the major orienteering champs. The below analysis of the results regarding runners running in packs from the WOC Long Qualifier is done by Henning Spjelkavik as a part of a work done on separation methods in orienteering (read more about the work here) – and the way to display the material is inspired by methods shown by Martin Lerjen for WOC 2007 results.

Note! Colored boxes in the below figures show that two runners have been within 15 seconds of each other at a control. Being within 15 seconds of each other does not necessarily mean that the runners get help from each other for the orienteering or to keep up higher speed – but if two runners are within 15 seconds of each other in a large part of the course, it indicated that at least one of the runners has gained time due to the grouping. These types of graphs are especially interesting in order to find out how effective separation methods are in orienteering.

EOC 2008 Long Qual – Men Heat A

Name 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Millinger Mattias
Pihl Peeter 10 10 10 10 10 10
Mrazek Jan 10 10 10 10 10 10
Bobach Christian 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Crane Matthew 9 9
Tervo Tuomas 9 9
Osterbo Oystein Kvaal 7 7 7
Prochazka Jan 7 7 7 7 7 7
Ozolins Janis
Casal Roger
Davies Bryn 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Novai Gyorgy 4 4
Mihailovs Kalvis 8 8
Kostylev Egor 4 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Sirakov Ivan 6 5 5 5 5
Fedotov Roman
Casado Juanma 5 1
Kuzminskis Tomas 6 5 5
Tenani Alessio 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Rollier Baptiste 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mihalkin Dmitry 5 5 5 5 5 5
Anjala Topi 2
Kandybey Yevhen 2 1 1 1 1
Seppi Andrea 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Stevenson Jamie 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Teich Christian 1 1
Merz Matthias 1
Lang Markus 3 3
Weltzien Audun Hultgreen 3 3
Aadli Erkki
Zinca Ionut
Krepsta Simonas
Efimov Roman 11 11 11 11 11 11
Wingstedt Emil 11 11 11 11 11 11

EOC 2008 Long Qual – Men Heat B

Name 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Sidorov Alexey
Lassen Tue 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Muller Matthias 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Lehto Jonne
Bortnik Alexey
Lang Thomas 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Bilevicius Liutauras 7 7 7
Troeng Mats 7 7 7
Kato Hiroyuki 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Domonyik Gabor 1 1 1
Breitschadel Felix 1
Tinchant Johann 5 5 5 5 1 1 1
Nordberg Anders 5 5 1
Pagliari Daniele 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Kraas Andreas 3 3 5 1 1 1
Fraser Scott 3 5 1
Skjeset Lars 3 3
Sulcys Nerijus 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 5
Gristwood Graham (8) +2.03 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Ohlund Erik (1) +0.00 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Schneider David 3 3
Bertuks Edgars 5 5
Gomez Javier 11 11 8 8
Omelchenko Yuri 11
Richert Marcin 11 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Karklins Kaspars (13) +3.17 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Lakanen Jani (4) +1.34 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Lucan Vladimir
Soes Rasmus 6 6 6 6 6 6
Denes Zoltan 6 4 4 4
Nikolov Kiril 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Pasquasy Fabien 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Haldin Mats 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Smola Michal
Karner Olle
Tranchand Frederic 9 9 9 9
Zlobin Denis 9 9 9 9
Negrello Manuel

EOC 2008 Long Qual – Men Heat C

Name 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Duncan Jon
Tambasov Yury
Kozak Osvald
Troan Hans
Caraglio Michele 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Pauzas Henrikas 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Magne Thibaut 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Krumins Janis 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9
Corona Emiliano
Ruedlinger Andreas 2
Kivlenieks Andris 2 2 2
Vaher Sander 2 2 2 2
Marchuk Oleksandr 5 5 5 5 5 5
Portal Daniel 3 3 6
Tsvetkov Dmitriy 5
Lind William 3 5 5 5 5 5
Olsen Rune (10) +4.07 3 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Nomm Marek (6) +2.03 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Ikonen Pasi (1) +0.00 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Delobel Bart
Christensen Christian 1 1 1 1
Kruger Robert 1 1 4
Wickholm Jorgen 1 1 1 1 1
Mukhidinov Vyacheslav
Dlabaja Tomas 1 1 1 1 1
Koizumi Shigeyuki 7
Johansson Martin Per 1 1 1 1 1 1
Lundanes Olav
Kovacs Adam 7 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Kerschbaumer Gernot (14) +5.00 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Johnson Oli (8) +2.57 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Hubmann Daniel (2) + 0.57 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Morrison Ross 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Sadeckas Darius
Khramov Andrey 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Gvozdev Pavel

EOC 2008 Long Qual – Women Heat A

Name 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Hagman Line
Duchova Iveta
Mackenzie Mhairi
Einikyte Reda
Sluta Olga 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Cejka Caroline 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Gaigala Dace 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
D’harreville Karine 2 2 2 2 2 2
Gustafsson Linnea 2 2 2 2 2 2
Rebane Kirti 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Rantanen Merja 7
Wild Angela 7
Soderlund Line
Goffre Anais 8 8
Shandurkova Iliana 8 8
Vanjuk Merike
Whitehouse Pippa
Leonhardt Karin 5 3
Guizzardi Michela 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 3
Gil Esther 5 5 5
Struhalova Olena 3 4 4 4
Brozkova Dana 5
Novikova Yulia 3
Persson Lina 3 3 3 3 3
Gyurko Fanni (11) +4.06 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Skrastina Aija (7) +2.19 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Hausken Anne Margrethe (1) +0.00 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Jukkola Heli
Pauzaite Sandra
Jaeger Meike

EOC 2008 Long Qual – Women Heat B

Name 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Palmer Helen
Kokina Kristine 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Stanchenko Larysa 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Rantala Maria 5 5 5
Seskeviciute Giedre 1 1 1
Weltzien Ingunn Hultgreen
Abzalone Zanda 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vercellotti Capucine 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Mulpas Vinciane 3 3 3 7 7 7
Luscher Sara 3
Bridle Helen 3 3
Reznichenko Olga 7 7
Kogure Madoka 2 2 2 2 2 2
Jurenikova Eva 7 7 7
Fernandez Annabel 2 2 2 2
Lillehov Thea 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Stara Zdenka 2 2 2 2 2
Klade Piret 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Korzhova Natalia 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Ory Eszter 2 2 2 2 2 2
Valaite Indre 2 2
Johanson Liis 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Voskoboynikova Tatiana 6 6 6 6 2 2 2
Elson Grace 6 6 6 2
Riddervold Marianne 6 2 2 2 2
Stalder Seline
Danylova Anastasiia 4 4
Engstrand Emma 4 4

EOC 2008 Long Qual – Women Heat C

Name 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Rafols Ona 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Egseth Elise 9 9
Sundberg Karoliina 9 9
Dockalova Martina 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Rihma Annika 2
Johansson Sofie 2 1 1
Muller Lea
Bastin Veronique 6 6 6 6
Ivanets Yevhenia 6 6 6
Zurcher Sandra 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Scaravonati Laura 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Fasting Mari 4 6
Ptasekaite Rasa 4 4
Polekshanova Darya 8 8
Vinogradova Galina 4 4 4 4
Bruvere Iveta 10 10 10
Rollins Sarah
Holmstrom Bodil 8
Billstam Annika 10 10 10
Kazlauskaite Inga (8) +4.03 8 8 8 8 8 8
Brozkova Radka (4) +1.50 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Dodin Celine (5) +2.05 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Ryabkina Tatiana (2) +0.07 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
Depta Monika
Brodmann Ines 5 5 5 5 5
Arama Una 5 5 5 3
Elder Rachael 5 5 5 5 5 3
Minoiu Veronica 3 3 3
Soes Signe 3 3 3 3 3
Bamba Yoko

About Jan Kocbach

Jan Kocbach is the founder of WorldofO.com - taking care of everything from site development to writing articles, photography and analysis.

Check Also

Route to Christmas: Day 10 2010

Todays leg in Route to Christmas is a leg from the United States with several ...

7 comments

  1. Very intressting. Kerschbaumer is able to run the speed of Hubmann (Heat C) over half the qualification race…

    I am looking forward to the analysis after the long final. As the start intervall is two minutes we should have lots of opportunities to see if the used separation techniques are working (or not).

  2. time for butterflys etc. in quals too?

  3. What does the numbers within the boxes mean?

  4. AL: Use of a separation method in the qualifiers (not necessarily butterflies though) is an interesting thought.

    -: The numbers in the boxes are only there to indicate which runners have been together – a numbering of each pack so to say.

  5. At the Mens Top Ten today… (me looking at the results)

    1. Tsvetkov: Together with Efimov (10.) since 11th control, together with Nikolov since 15th control, with Mihalkin since 22nd Control.
    2. Hubmann: First contact with Johannson (5.) at the 8th control, running togehter with Johannson from the 16th control
    3. Wingstedt: Some not very cooperative contacts with Wickholm. Together with Lucan (14.) from the 13th control (but Lucan always behind)
    4. Merz: Ran the whole thing alone
    5. Johannson: catched up by Hubmann at 16th
    6. Rollier: Ran the whole thing alone
    7. Bertuks: Together with Schneider (23.) from the 19th
    8. Weltzien: Contacts with Troeng from the 12th, together with Troeng from 16th to 25th
    9. Ikonen: with Öhlund (23.) 3rd to 6th control, and 16th to 19th, else alone.
    10. Efimov, see Tsvetkov (1.)

    Some comments to this:
    1) 16th control is at the middle of the race, if two runners catch up there, they are running half the race together
    2) I doubt that the competition is fair. See the case of Merz, Rollier and Wingsted (somehow) all considered running alone: Tsvetkov makes the difference from the moment he runs with Efimov. Hubmann and Johannson make the difference from the moment they run together.

    So.I have nothing against Tsvetkov, he is the winner. Let’s just put some effort in avoiding that amount of mutual influencing among the top ten of a Championchip.

  6. Okay. Another one… just playing. The Ranking of Longest mutual influence* during todays long distance final:

    1. Olson & Haldin 84 Min.
    2. Smola & Millinger 64 Min.
    3. Kerschbaumer & Letho 63.5 Min.
    4. Tsvetkov & Efimov 53 Min.
    5. Wingstedt & Lucan 51 Min.
    6. Teich & Karklins 46 Min.
    7. Tsvetkov & Efimov & Nikolov 45 Min.
    8. Hubmann & Johansson 42 Min.
    9. Prochazka & Mrazek & Breitschädel 37 Min.
    10.Osterbo & Teich & Karklins 36 Min.
    11.Lakanen & Lundanes 35 Min.
    12.Schneider & Bertuks 34 Min.
    13.Bortnik & Dlabaja 32 Min.
    13.Gristwood & Kostylev 32 Min.
    13.Troeng & Weltzien 32 Min.
    16.Smola & Osterbo & Teich & Millinger & Karklins 31 Min.
    17. Tsetkov & Efimov & Nikolov & Mihalkin 20 Min.
    18.Krumins & Haldin & Olsen 10 Min.
    19.Johnson & Schneider 8 Min.


    No Ranked: Skjeset, Tervo, Lind, Sadeckas, Merz, Rollier, Ikonen, Norberg, Kärner and others.

    *Punching every control not more than 15 seconds apart

  7. Martin, thanks for this very interestig analysis!