Czech National Coach chooses WOC in Trondheim

Posted by Jan Kocbach, 31 Oct 2010@16:00


Both the best and one of the worst courses in 2010 were at the World Champs – the best in one of the qualification races and the “worst” in one of the WOC finals. At least that is the opinion of Czech National Team coach Radek Novotny when asked about the best and worst course he saw in 2010.

Novotny chooses the mens C course from the sprint qualification at WOC in Trondheim. – An example of qualified and creative work, says Novotny. – To me, every course should have its soul, its inner logic. The course-setter should be able to explain the specific meaning of every single leg on the course, the Czech coach answers when asked about the key ingredients in a good course. – Currently my impression is that the approach sounds: “make 2-3 good legs and the rest is not important”.

WorldofO.com has interviewed Radek Novotny for “The Course of the Year 2010″ – you can read more about “The Course of the Year 2010″ here, including all the suggestions by WorldofO.com readers – and also suggest your own courses and win great prizes by Trimtex and sun-o.com (more info about prizes and sponsors below the interview).

Interview with Radek Novotny

Thanks a lot to Radek Novotny who took the time to answer a few questions for “The Course of the Year 2010″.

Q: What was the best course you saw in 2010 – and why?
Uuuugh… I would not dare to point out just one as the winner… but as this is certainly partly meant as entertainment, like every pool, I should try to pick one… ;)
I will try to focus on course setting, not attractivity of the terrain. To have it easier, I will stick to the international level. My option would then be the sprint qualification at WOC in Trondheim, course men C (see also map above).
This course is according to the sprint philosophy (well managed especially in the forest), with lots of variation and route choices. An example of qualified and creative work.


Q: What was the best course you set as a course setter in 2010 – and why?
Apart from the selection races, which I always tune a lot, I was quite happy with one training course for sandstones.cz (see map with course here). Many fundamental route choices accompanied by fine orienteering. (If this course would be a real long distance competition, the controls would not be so tricky.)

And then, one relay training in Halden – it was more like a puzzle solving, a funny stuff. I had only a limited amount of SI units (17) and wanted to create valuable forked 1st leg training. Among others, Emil Wingstedt and Helena Jansson were taking part – I wanted to have it challenging enough. Finally, I have found control places and course shape suitable enough, so that I´ve got many unique course alternatives, where the course lengths were equal, while the runners were still running in the same direction just taking some more control or jumping over. E.g. someone could have the first control the same as was the last one for another guy… ;)
See all courses here and one course example here.

I consider also route-choice analysis an important part of the course-setting. As a feedback, a verification. It is amazing how many route-choice alternatives the creative elite people can usually find, if they get a chance. For those interested, my analysis from 2010 are now made public here (text in czech, but pictures in picture language ;) .

Q: What is the worst course you saw in 2010?
Unfortunately, I couldn´t like the middle distance final at WOC. I wouldn´t say that it was the worst course of the year, but for me it was the biggest disillusion. This middle distance course was clearly against the valid IOF guidlines, against all what fine orienteering stands for. I was just rather surprised that such a course was, more or less, accepted. A very dangerous signal for the future development – I still do belive, that we can provide both good TV transmissions & show, while preserving the real essence of high-class orienteering. We should namely not forget, that the main reason why our sport is this well developed is the huge devotion of all key players, most of all athletes. And their motivation comes from their desire for attractive challenges and unique enjoyments. Maybe I am foolish, but I have recently heard many same opinions…

Q: What is the best course you have run ever – if you must pick one from the top of your head?
Again, hard to pick just one. But the international season 1998 was probably the one I liked most. Great WC races in Ireland, GB, Sweden, Slovakia, Finland, Estonia… The countries offered the best terrains they had. And I will allways remember WUOC 1998 in Trondheim, the long distance with its start located up on the Vassfjellet and finish down by the skicentrum. We were to face 3 different types of terrain from the open, over the semi-open slope marches into almost continental thicker forest towards the end. True challenge, real natural enjoyment. [Editors comment: Unfortunately I could not find this course anywhere. If any of the readers could dig this out, it would be great to see it. Thanks to Rolf Breckle, we've now got the course online (with the route of Breckle drawn - giving a 17th spot for the record).].

Q: Are the courses generally getting better, worse or staying on a level?
Here, it will be probably difficult to have an objective insight, as we all obey to a certain nostalgy ;) But if we consider the terrain choice to be an integral part of the “course”, then definitely worse. But even the course-setting itself… Some courses are great, but quite often I am disappointed because of lack of really interesting legs. Currently my impression is that the approach sounds: “make 2-3 good legs and the rest is not important”. To me, every course should have its soul, its inner logic. The course-setter should be able to explain the specific meaning of every single leg on the course.

Q: What is the most important ingredients in a course in order for it to be a good course – in your opinion?
The course-setting is an art. That´s why it´s almost impossible to define a “good one”. Despite that, I have tried to developed my own verification concept, consisting of 8 key questions. If the answer is “yes” to all the questions, the probability, that the course is quite OK, is higher.

  • Is the course according to the definition of the particular discipline?
  • Is it variable, both as for the direction changes and leg lengths?
  • Is the terrain well exploited? E.g. longer legs across the natural barriers, fine orienteering in the detailed parts?
  • Is it avoiding any meaningless climbing and sharp angles?
  • Does the course eliminate the influence of coincidence? Are the controls fair?
  • Does the course use also some green areas? (Specific czech problem – some course-setters avoid “green” controls, but that generally hurts our o-technique.)
  • Can you rationally explain the purpose of most legs?
  • Is the course INSPIRATIVE?

Q: What are your goals for next year for the Czech Team – and what are you doing in order to achieve them?
Our goal would be to start a new positive trend in our work, as we were generally not satisfied with the outcome from the last season (apart from some great results of Dana, Eva, Vendula…). We have a number of young talents, which need to take yet some more steps into the world´s elite.
For the next season, we want to focus more on the real race experience. We will try to run more test races. The training camps will be shorter, including always some training competitions – a bit like the French do at their weekend trips. We need to evoke the inner competition inside the team again and – like during the previous years – will search for good sparring partners at some of the camps or selection races. The intention is also to deploy the GPS analysis in a wider extend. I also want to influence the runners in terms of more efficient “winter” training. So that we would really get some evidence of improvement, and not just swallowed big volumes without any feedback.
The season is, unfortunately, short of big, valuable international competitions, especially during the spring. I have re-considered the NORT issue, but again had to refuse it because of “too little fun for too much money”. The logistic side of this project is still out of our range. So for us, the main goals would be the WOC and the WC races at the home soil. We are also planning to participate at Swiss Champs in april, it´s gonna be exciting and a new experience.

Q: In addition to being the Czech national trainer, you have started organizing training camps in the Czech sandstone areas. I’ve been impressed by some of the training camps for the national team you have organized earlier (like e.g. the one in France last year which got a lot of praise). How are the trainings in the Czech sandstone camps compared to the national team training camps?
It depends on the “client”. For a happy club trip of children and motioners we try to prepare intensive rocky experience, playful orienteering with just a little of running. But for the elite guests I try to set up a program as close to what we´ve recently done in the national team as possible, using all my experience and skills. Each session has its specific focus, every leg should have it´s meaning. And the runners should also gain valuable profit from the training in the group – either from splittimes comparison, or from the contact orienteering exercises. I also like to provide some extraordinary trainings which I have developed for our national team, like the “start moment training”, “memory run with compass” or “path relay”. All of them can be found at our national team webpage. Some of them also directly at www.sandstones.cz.

Prizes from our Sponsors

Prizes from our Sponsors always makes it more fun! There will be a prize for the course setter in “The course of the Year 2010″, a price for the first one suggesting the course which ends up becoming “The course of the Year 2010″, and finally prizes drawn among all suggesting and voting.

Sponsors for “The course of the Year 2010″:

  • trimtexTrimtex sponsors “The course of the year 2010″ with 10 prizes. More information about the prizes to come. Trimtex Sport make technical team wear for athletes in clubs and companies. Trimtex’s products are world-leading within function, design and quality, whether it’s for cycling, running, skiing or orienteering.
  • sun-o.com sponsors “The course of the year 2010″ with a voucher for a 2011 Sun-O Camp, value of 150 Euro. Sun-o offers orienteering travel-packages in Spain and Portugal, combining high quality terrains and varied O-maps, in regions with rich culture and sunny climate – organizing your O-holidays from from start to finish.
    suno

  • For the record: All sponsor gifts/income related to “The Best Course of 2010″ goes directly to the WorldofO.com readers.

Helena Jansson chooses Portugal

Posted by Jan Kocbach, 30 Oct 2010@10:00


- It was such a cool place and really fun and demanding orienteering, Helena Jansson explains about her favourite course in 2010 – the NAOM WRE-competition in Crato, Portugal at the 20th of Febuary. Helena Jansson – who won silver in the sprint at the World Champs in Norway this year and gold at the sprint in the World Champs in Hungary last year – must be counted as a sprint specialist, but still the Swedish star chooses a long distance course has her favourite in 2010.

When asked what makes a course good, Jansson has an interesting description: - The courses that are really good makes you feel worried and unsecure while in the forest, makes you have to use all your experience to make the right decisions, and has you sitting afterwards still not being able to always figure out what was the right thing to do.

WorldofO.com has interviewed Helena Jansson for “The Course of the Year 2010″ – you can read more about “The Course of the Year 2010″ here, including all the suggestions by WorldofO.com readers – and also suggest your own courses and win great prizes by Trimtex and sun-o.com (more info about prizes and sponsors below the interview).

Interview with Helena Jansson

Thanks a lot to Helena Jansson who took the time to answer a few questions for “The Course of the Year 2010″.


Q: What was the best course you run in 2010 – and why?
- My best course this year was the NAOM WRE-competition in Crato, Portugal, 20th of Febuary. It was such a cool place and really fun and demanding orienteering.

Q: What is the worst course you run in 2010?
I have no idea. I’m not very good at telling if the course is good or bad, or if it is my own performance that is good or bad. I did have some even higher expectations for the WOC middle distance, but to go as far as to say that it was the worst course, I don’t know. The worst ever orienteering I did was on a beach-map in Italy (Gargano) where the forest was like a huge web full of thorns that you got stuck in. But then again, that was bad terrain, not a bad course.
What is the best course you have run ever – if you must pick one from the top of your head?
- The long distance at WOC in Hungary was on of the most beautiful and fun long distances I have ever run.

Q: Are the courses generally getting better, worse or staying on a level?
- In international events such as WOC, WC and EOC they are surely having to adapt to the concept with spectator controls and such, but I don’t think the courses have to get worse because of that. I think there is a development towards faster and tighter competitions overall, and that is something you can see in the courses.
Q: What is the most important ingredients in a course in order for it to be a good course – in your opinion?
- That it is a challenge! That can mean a lot, but the courses that are really good makes you feel worried and unsecure while in the forest, makes you have to use all your experience to make the right decisions, and has you sitting afterwards still not being able to always figure out what was the right thing to do.
Q: What are your goals for next year – and how do you change your training and focus in order to reach your goals in 2011?
- I still haven’t run a really good race in the long- or middle distance in a World Champs, and so the struggle towards that continues. I will need to spend a large amount of time in the forests of France if I’m gonna be able to pull that off, and so that is what I will do. I will also continue on my way towards getting even better physichally and mentally (still a wreck when the race is important).

Prizes from our Sponsors

Prizes from our Sponsors always makes it more fun! There will be a prize for the course setter in “The course of the Year 2010″, a price for the first one suggesting the course which ends up becoming “The course of the Year 2010″, and finally prizes drawn among all suggesting and voting.

Sponsors for “The course of the Year 2010″:

  • trimtexTrimtex sponsors “The course of the year 2010″ with 10 prizes. More information about the prizes to come. Trimtex Sport make technical team wear for athletes in clubs and companies. Trimtex’s products are world-leading within function, design and quality, whether it’s for cycling, running, skiing or orienteering.
  • sun-o.com sponsors “The course of the year 2010″ with a voucher for a 2011 Sun-O Camp, value of 150 Euro. Sun-o offers orienteering travel-packages in Spain and Portugal, combining high quality terrains and varied O-maps, in regions with rich culture and sunny climate – organizing your O-holidays from from start to finish.
    suno

  • For the record: All sponsor gifts/income related to “The Best Course of 2010″ goes directly to the WorldofO.com readers.

Course of the Year 2010: Submit your suggestions!

Posted by Jan Kocbach, 27 Oct 2010@22:00


What was the best orienteering course of 2010? Finding THE ONE won’t be easy, but the search for it will be fun, for sure! The rules are simple: Suggest a course from a competition or training in 2010, and state the reason why you think this course deserves to be “The course of the Year 2010″.

A jury of elite orienteers will choose the best among all the suggestions – and there will be a voting process among the readers of “World of O” in order to name “The course of the year 2010″. Prizes from sponsors make it more fun to be in on the suggestions and voting – Trimtex and sun-o.com are sponsoring “The course of the year 2010″ with great prizes (see below).

Use the comments below, and submit either

  1. The course which in your opinion is the best course you run in 2010 yourself!
  2. The best course you set this year as a course-setter.
  3. The overall best course you have seen/heard about in 2010

Most course-setters surely have to make some compromises, so finding the perfect one is probably not possible. Still, it is interesting to see which is the best course you run or set in 2010!

Starting point

To provide you with a starting point, I’ve picked out a few very different candidates for you based on maps and courses I have seen in omaps.worldofo.com and comments on various webpages:

I am sure you have a lot of better suggestions than the one I gave above – this is just a starting point to see the wide variety of candidates there are out there. Submit your suggestions now!

Rules

The following rules are given for “The course of the Year 2010″.

  • The course must have been run in competition or training in 2010.
  • Suggestions are submitted as a comment to this post – including link to the map with course in a quality which is good enough for the readers to understand the course and the challenges involved. Please add information about location/date if that is not clear from the link provided.
  • You must give a reason for why you think this course deserves to be named “The course of the Year 2010″ (or why it is the best course you run/set this year)
  • All reasons are valid. Examples can for example be “varied orienteering challenges”, “extremely technical orienteering”, “high fun-factor”, “fantastic map”, “spectacular orienteering”, “fantastic nature” – a combination of these – or a totally different reason. To get all the way to the top you should probably have a combination of reasons…
  • The course may be any discipline – e.g. a long distance, a middle distance, a sprint distance. It may also be a technical training course – like e.g. a corridor orienteering exercise.
  • A jury of elite orienteers will choose the best of all the suggestions – and there will be a voting process among the readers of “World of O” in order to name “The course of the year 2010″.
Prizes from our Sponsors

Prizes from our Sponsors always makes it more fun! There will be a prize for the course setter in “The course of the Year 2010″, a price for the first one suggesting the course which ends up becoming “The course of the Year 2010″, and finally prizes drawn among all suggesting and voting.

Sponsors for “The course of the Year 2010″:

  • trimtexTrimtex sponsors “The course of the year 2010″ with 10 prizes. More information about the prizes to come. Trimtex Sport make technical team wear for athletes in clubs and companies. Trimtex’s products are world-leading within function, design and quality, whether it’s for cycling, running, skiing or orienteering.
  • sun-o.com sponsors “The course of the year 2010″ with a voucher for a 2011 Sun-O Camp, value of 150 Euro. Sun-o offers orienteering travel-packages in Spain and Portugal, combining high quality terrains and varied O-maps, in regions with rich culture and sunny climate – organizing your O-holidays from from start to finish.
    suno

  • For the record: All sponsor gifts/income related to “The Best Course of 2010″ goes directly to the WorldofO.com readers.

XC Predictions: Season coming up!

Posted by Jan Kocbach, 24 Oct 2010@0:30

HeadCam action from Team Norway

Posted by Jan Kocbach, 18 Oct 2010@16:00

HeadCam actionSee some of the top Norwegian stars running fast in French forest – including Holger Hott and Lars Skjeset – in this video from the Team Norway training camp in France the first week in October.

Starring Holger Hott, Lars Skjeset, Anders Nordberg, Audun Weltzien and Petter Thoresen. HeadCam runners Øystein Kristiansen and Ivar Haugen. Edited by Jan Kocbach. Music by UGRESS (ugress.com).

About

The HeadCam video is made using a HeadCam of type Contour Vholdr, which has replaced my previous Blackeye II as my favourite HeadCam. The main reason for the change to the Contour camera is that the Contour camera is just one unit on the head, whereas the Blackeye II consists of two parts – one which is carried on the back and one on the head. The Blackeye was slightly better to wear on the head, but you needed to carry a lot of extra stuff on your back, making it more complicated. The Contour camera has also significant better video quality. Another option would be the GoPro HeadCam series, which I have not tested personally, but which is said to be just as good as the Vholdr.

Note that in some of the previous HeadCam videos I have made, I have added a small map with synchronized runner position (see samples below). This makes it much easier to use HeadCam action as part of analysis, as you can get a direct comparison between video and map position.

More HeadCam action

Below is some more HeadCam action I have made with the Contour camera (the two first videos) and with the Blackeye II camera (the lower ones). Now I’m just longing to get injury-free and run with the camera on my own head… Coming up some time this winter is also a HeadCam video from the Norwegian Champs middle in great mountain terrain in Beitostølen – the location for O-festivalen 2012.

Fantasy WC: Tighter than the real World Cup!

Posted by Jan Kocbach, 12 Oct 2010@8:00

DSC_4314_s

Whereas Simone Niggli and Daniel Hubmann took clear victories in the real World Cup, it was a lot tighter in the Fantasy World Cup. The team OrientExpress with manager Ulis took the victory with 7745.45 points according to the unofficial results – only 11.3 points ahead of the BennyB-team. With double points, the sprint final in Geneva decided the Fantasy World Cup. OrientExpress won the last race – and thus pushed the BennyB-team down from the top.

Thank you to everybody for participating in the Fantasy World Cup!

Note! This article is based on unofficial Fantasy World Cup results. Please add a comment below if you find any errors in the calculations!

Overall results
Place Team name Manager Points so far E-mail address
1. OrientExpress Ulis 7745.45 points info@—–.—
2. BennyB-team Benny B 7734.15 points b-sats@—–.—
3. The Great Bananas Martin Hoset 7600.20 points martin_hoset@—–.—
4. RLD-observer Sveinung 7599.55 points sveinungws@—–.—
5. Togges team Torgny Lindström 7591.00 points torgny.lindstrom@—–.—
6. Bushmen Kristoffer Fiane Pedersen 7563.45 points kristofferfp@—–.—
7. Skogvokterne Magnus Johnsson 7538.20 points magnus@—–.—
8. Tutzoooom Torben Utzon 7533.90 points tutzon@—–.—
9. Krajo dream team Michal Krajčík 7452.20 points mikrajo@—–.—
10. sloths Pete H 7409.50 points peter.huzan@—–.—

World Cup Final Sprint: Map and Results

Posted by Jan Kocbach, 10 Oct 2010@15:11


- I have not often had this long a routechoice leg in a city sprint, an enthusiastic Simone Niggli – winner of the womens class in the World Cup final – said after the race. Niggli and Daniel Hubmann took popular victories on home ground in the old city of Geneva – both giving the big and load home crowd exactly what they had come for.

In the overall World Cup, Matthias Müller (SUI) had to finish either first or second to win – while Hubmann would have to do a poor race. Müller managed his task – sharing the second spot with Graham Gristwood (GBR). However, Hubmann was even faster – and thus Daniel Hubmann could celebrate his third overall World Cup victory.

DSC_4314_s

In the womens class, Simone Niggli had already won the overall World Cup. Niggli, however, showed again that she is the queen of orienteering – winning yet another victory in this years World Cup.

Many routechoices

The leg Niggli was talking about is the long leg from number 5 to number 6 – which was the same both for the men and the women. You can test your skills in this webroute before looking at the course setters “solution” below.

According to the course setter, the right route is the fastest one (orange in the map below), whereas between 6 and 15 seconds is lost by choosing the other variants (one other variant illustrated in blue below).
5to6

There were also several other interesting route choices in this tricky city sprint. – You can loose 5-10 seconds at nearly every leg, said the course setter Sami Vaehaenen when discussing the details in the course after the event. Vaehaenen will now have some interesting hours comparing his test running results with the actual results from the sprint race – we hope to be able to present the results here at World of O.

Some webroutes for you to do some thinking:

Maps

Below you see the complete courses for both men and women in the Geneva city sprint which marked the end of the 2010 World Cup.

Results

Women
wom_s
1. NIGGLI-LUDER Simone SUI 16:36
2. JANSSON Helena SWE 16:50 +00:14
3. BOBACH Ida DEN 17:21 +00:45
4. CEJKA Caroline SUI 17:24 +00:48
4. ALM Maja DEN 17:24 +00:48
6. WILD Angela SUI 17:31 +00:55
7. FRIEDERICH Rahel SUI 17:32 +00:56
8. EGSETH Elise NOR 17:35 +00:59
8. ELIASSON Lena SWE 17:35 +00:59
10. BRODMANN Ines SUI 17:37 +01:01

Men
men_s
1. HUBMANN Daniel SUI 15:39
2. MÜLLER Matthias SUI 15:48 +00:09
2. GRISTWOOD Graham GBR 15:48 +00:09
4. GUEORGIOU Thierry FRA 15:52 +00:13
5. ØSTERBØ Øystein Kvaal NOR 15:53 +00:14
6. SKJESET Lars NOR 16:14 +00:35
7. KYBURZ Andreas SUI 16:15 +00:36
7. LYSELL Jerker SWE 16:15 +00:36
9. MERZ Matthias SUI 16:18 +00:39
10. WELTZIEN Audun NOR 16:25 +00:46

World Cup Final Live from 12:15 CET

Posted by Jan Kocbach, 10 Oct 2010@12:00

Follow the final race of the 2010 World Cup from Geneva, Switzerland live from 12:15 CET. First start in the womens class is at 12:15 CET – with Simone Niggli starting at 12:54 as the last starter. First start in the mens class is at 13:25 CET – with Daniel Hubmann starting last at 14:04 CET.

In the womens class, the overall World Cup is already decided. In the mens class, there is still a fight between Daniel Hubmann and Matthias Müller for the overall World Cup – but with a lead of 154 points for Hubmann ahead of the final race, Müller must either win with Hubmann in 17th place or worse – or Müller must be second with Hubmann in 37th or worse for Müller to win the overall World Cup.

World Cup Final Middle: Map and Results

Posted by Jan Kocbach, 09 Oct 2010@16:45


Thierry Gueorgiou and Simone Niggli took home the victories in todays World Cup over the middle distance in Switzerland – in a terrain which was not as technical as many of the runners had expected.

Simone Niggli had already decided the overall World Cup in the womens class – and with today’s 3rd spot for Daniel Hubmann and 4th spot for Matthias Müller, it is now also clear that there will be a Swiss overall World Cup winner in the mens class – either Hubmann or Müller.

wcf11

About the map and courses

- It was quite a good race. I did three times 20 seconds mistake – at the 7th control, the 17th control and the 20th control, Thierry Gueorgiou told after the event.

- The map was easy to read, but the runnability was not clear from looking on the map, so you had to be flexible in your orienteering, the tall French runner told after winning his second World Cup title in a row.

The orienteering was boring compared to what met the runners last weekend in France. – It was not very technical orienteering, Thierry Gueorgiou told after the event.

The Scandinavian runners, however, feel that they still have something to learn in this kind of terrain. – I think I have a lot to learn, it is quite different from Norwegian terrain, Olav Lundanes in second spot commented at the press conference. – The biggest challenge in this terrain is to run fast enough and orienteer well enough, according to Lundanes.

The overall World Cup

In the mens class the fight for the overall World Cup now is between Daniel Hubmann and Matthias Müller. Hubmann, however, has a clear lead. Müller has to win with Hubmann in 17th spot or worse in order to take the overall World Cup from Hubmann.

- I did not have any pain in my foot today, as I got an injection to remove the pain, Hubmann said after the race – and he now thinks that he will manage to take home the overall World Cup. – I have a lot more self confidence than yesterday.

Simone Niggli has already won the overall World Cup in the womens class – and just increased her victory margin with todays World Cup victory. The victory today was special for Niggli, as it is her 50th World Cup victory.

Results

Men
DSC_3916_s
1. GUEORGIOU Thierry FRA 35:30
2. LUNDANES Olav NOR 36:38 +01:08
3. HUBMANN Daniel SUI 36:46 +01:16
4. MÜLLER Matthias SUI 37:02 +01:32
5. ROLLIER Baptiste SUI 37:15 +01:45
6. HUOVILA Jarkko FIN 37:25 +01:55
7. HALDIN Mats FIN 37:27 +01:57
8. KHRAMOV Andrey RUS 37:34 +02:04
9. MERZ Matthias SUI 38:00 +02:30
9. KAAS Carl Waaler NOR 38:00 +02:30

Women
DSC_3876_s
1. NIGGLI-LUDER Simone SUI 37:46
2. JANSSON Helena SWE 39:22 +01:36
3. FASTING Mari NOR 41:43 +03:57
4. BILLSTAM Annika SWE 41:55 +04:09
5. FRIEDERICH Rahel SUI 42:10 +04:24
6. PERSSON Lina SWE 42:44 +04:58
7. CEJKA Caroline SUI 43:14 +05:28
8. RANTALA Maria FIN 43:18 +05:32
9. LÜSCHER Sara SUI 43:39 +05:53
10. HAUSKEN Anne Margrethe NOR 43:41 +05:55

World Cup Final: Will Hubmann take it home?

Posted by Jan Kocbach, 08 Oct 2010@8:00

DSC_3663_s
More technical orienteering than in the previous editions of the World Cup Final weekend (see map from Model event above) is what the world orienteering elite will meet in the Swiss part of the Jura mountains – just on the border to France – this Saturday. The World Cup Final weekend consists of a middle distance race on Saturday and a sprint race in Geneva on Sunday.

The middle distance on Saturday is extra important due to the fact that the race is held just south of the area which is embargoed for the World Orienteering Championships in 2012 – and thus this is one of the early steps in the preparations for WOC 2012 for many teams.

Many teams have spent the week between the World Cup race in France last Sunday and this weekend in France making preparations for the World Orienteering Champs in 2011 (and partly also for the World Championships in 2012) – and thus many runners have absorbed a lot of training in the tricky terrain south of Annecy the last days, and will therefore not be 100% prepared physically for the World Cup Final.

Relevant links
Fight for the Triple

danielhubmann_WOC2009SprintFinal 8_s
In the mens class there is still a fight for the overall World Cup victory. Daniel Hubmann has a lead of 144 points down to Matthias Müller in second spot. With 300 points to fight for in the two last races (100 points for victory, points are doubled in the sprint on Sunday) – and both races counting for all runners, this would normally be an easy task for Hubmann who is chasing his third overall World Cup victory. However, Hubmann has injury-problems and quit his race after 9 controls in France last weekend after trying to run without injection of sedatives. Hubmann is, however, planning to start both days in the World Cup final, and will have a lead of at least 44 points when starting on the sprint on Sunday even if getting another race with zero World Cup points on Saturday. In theory, 9 runners can win the overall World Cup in the mens class (actually 8 as Fabian Hertner is not running due to his injury at WOC in Trondheim):

1. 547, Daniel Hubmann, SUI
2. 403, Matthias Müller, SUI
3. 379, Fabian Hertner, SUI
4. 328, Carl Waaler Kaas, NOR
5. 321, Valentin Novikov, RUS
6. 320, Audun Weltzien, NOR
7. 301, Matthias Merz, SUI
8. 296, Olav Lundanes, NOR
9. 250, Thierry Gueorgiou, FRA

Due to the double set of points on the sprint race on Sunday, this last sprint race is the key to the overall World Cup victory (not all runners are happy that sprint is this important in the overall World Cup – 4 races along with the middle/sprint combo in NORT compared to three long distance races). Some thoughts around the possible outcomes:

  • Müller has a good chance to win the overall World Cup if he takes victories both Saturday and Sunday. Hubmann then needs 156 points – which means that with a second spot on the sprint he would need no points on the middle, with a third spot on the sprint he would need a 7th spot on the middle, and with a fourth spot on the sprint he would need a third spot on the middle distance.
  • For each spot Müller looses on the sprint, his chances for an overall World Cup victory are decreased significantly. Even if Hubmann gets no World Cup points at all this weekend, Müller must perform well in the weekend – victory in the middle distance and 6th spot in the sprint would not be enough.
  • Carl Waaler Kaas – now in third spot – needs 219 points to pass Hubmann. With a victory in the sprint and a 21st spot in the middle distance that would be possible. However, the strength of Kaas is rather on the middle distance (where he is reigning World Champion) than in the sprint – and even with a victory on the middle distance Kaas would need a third spot on the sprint to take home the overall World Cup.
  • Gueorgiou has only a theoretical chance of winning the overall World Cup. Gueorgiou needs two victories, and Hubmann must be number 38 or worse – in addition to several other top runners underperforming…

The most probable outcome is thus the third overall World Cup victory for Hubmann – but the injury makes it a bit more interesting for the spectators (of which a lot are expected in Geneva on Sunday).

World Cup victory number 50?

DSC_3495_s
Among the women, Simone Niggli has already decided the overall World Cup with her victory last weekend – now being 310 points ahead of Helena Jansson in second spot with 300 points to run for. According to Swiss Orienteering, the race on Saturday is still important for Niggli as she is running for her 50th World Cup victory! Nobody would be surprised if Niggli took her 50th World Cup victory this weekend – and maybe even her 51st….

1. 780, Simone Niggli-Luder, SUI
2. 470, Helena Jansson, SWE
3. 352, Marianne Andersen, NOR
4. 309, Minna Kauppi, FIN
5. 298, Maja Alm, DEN
6. 288, Lena Eliasson, SWE
7. 286, Dana Brožková, CZE
8. 273, Annika Billstam, SWE
9. 250, Anni-Maija Fincke, FIN
10. 211, Celine Dodin, FRA

Fantasy World Cup

Along with the World Cup, the Fantasy World Cup is decided this weekend. If you are participating in the Fantasy World Cup, remember to set up your team ahead of the World Cup finals in order to get maximum World Cup points. With double amount of points, a lot can happen in the final race!

Place Team name Manager Points so far E-mail address
1. OrientExpress Ulis 6419.05 points info@—–.—
2. Togges team Torgny Lindström 6338.25 points torgny.lindstrom@—–.—
3. BennyB-team Benny B 6299.65 points b-sats@—–.—
4. Tutzoooom Torben Utzon 6291.10 points tutzon@—–.—
5. Team Thrane Rasmus Thrane Hansen 6265.00 points Mrhard_hard4ever@—–.—
6. Bushmen Kristoffer Fiane Pedersen 6258.55 points kristofferfp@—–.—
7. RLD-observer Sveinung 6207.00 points sveinungws@—–.—
8. The Great Bananas Martin Hoset 6174.90 points martin_hoset@—–.—
9. sloths Pete H 6101.50 points peter.huzan@—–.—
10. Skogvokterne Magnus Johnsson 6099.20 points magnus@—–.—
Next Page »